Fighting Back: What You Can Recover in an Indiana Deceptive Trade Case

A breakdown of the financial and legal remedies available to victims of fraud and misrepresentation

every industry needs a leader

empower the leader in you

every industry needs a leader • empower the leader in you •

In Indiana, consumer protection is primarily anchored by the Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act (IDCSA). While many see "deceptive trade" as a broad moral grievance, the Indiana legal framework provides a specific, tiered system of remedies designed to make the consumer whole and penalize bad actors.

Here is a breakdown of the remedies available under the IDCSA.

Actual Damages and Restitution

The foundational remedy for any consumer successful in an IDCSA claim is the recovery of actual damages. This is the quantifiable financial loss suffered due to the deceptive act. For instance, if a car dealer misrepresented the mileage or mechanical history of a vehicle, the actual damages would typically be the difference between the price paid and the actual market value of the vehicle in its true condition.

In cases where a contract is deemed unenforceable or voidable due to fraud, a court may order restitution, effectively "unwinding" the deal and returning both parties to their pre-transaction state.

Statutory and Treble Damages

Indiana law recognizes that actual damages are sometimes too small to justify the cost of litigation, yet the deception still warrants punishment. For "incurable" deceptive acts—those committed as part of a scheme to defraud—the court has the discretion to award statutory damages (often up to $500 per violation).

More significantly, if the consumer can prove that the deception was "willful," the court may award treble damages (three times the amount of actual damages). This serves as both a powerful incentive for private attorneys to take on consumer cases and a deterrent against predatory business practices.

Attorney’s Fees and Court Costs

Perhaps the most vital remedy in the IDCSA is the provision for reasonable attorney's fees. Without this, a consumer losing $2,000 to a scam would find it economically impossible to hire a lawyer. By allowing the prevailing consumer to shift the legal costs to the deceptive business, Indiana law ensures that "small" victims still have a path to justice.

Injunctive Relief and Attorney General Actions

Remedies aren't always about money. Consumers (and the state) can seek injunctive relief, which is a court order demanding the business immediately cease the deceptive practice.

While individual consumers can sue, the Indiana Attorney General has unique powers. The AG can seek civil penalties of up to $5,000 per knowing violation (payable to the state) and can establish a restitution fund for all affected consumers, even those who didn't join a specific lawsuit.

The "Notice" Requirement: A Critical Hurdle

It is important to note that many of these remedies are contingent upon the consumer providing the supplier with a "notice of the deceptive act" within six months of the transaction (or within a certain window after discovery). Failure to provide this notice can, in some circumstances, limit the consumer’s ability to collect certain damages or fees.


Information published to or by The Industry Leader will never constitute legal, financial or business advice of any kind, nor should it ever be misconstrued or relied on as such. For individualized support for yourself or your business, we strongly encourage you to seek appropriate counsel.


Graham Settleman

Graham illustrates legal concepts with a focus on educational, personal and business matters. Passionate about human connection, communication and understanding, his work reflects a curiosity for simplifying complex concepts.

Previous
Previous

Enrolling Your Child in Avis: A Parent’s Guide to the Jersey Shore System

Next
Next

Beyond the State Level: Understanding Your Federal Business Obligations