From Classrooms to City Hall: NYC Education Leaders' Impact on Candidates and Policies
Examining Visible Alliances and Hidden Lobbying in the Battle for NYC's Schools and City Hall
every industry needs a leader
•
empower the leader in you
•
every industry needs a leader • empower the leader in you •
In the heated 2025 New York City mayoral race, education emerges as a pivotal battleground, with candidates like Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, incumbent Eric Adams (running as a Democrat despite challenges), independent Andrew Cuomo, and Republican Curtis Sliwa vying for votes amid debates over school governance, funding, and equity. Public school principals, chancellors, union representatives, and PTA networks play crucial roles in shaping outcomes, exerting both visible and subtle pressures on candidates. Their influence stems from the city’s massive $40 billion education budget and the system’s impact on over a million students, making endorsements and advocacy high-stakes tools that can elevate or undermine campaigns.
Political Endorsements & Alliances
Endorsements from education leaders can dramatically boost a candidate’s visibility and credibility, providing organizational muscle for voter outreach and fundraising. The United Federation of Teachers (UFT), representing nearly 200,000 members, has historically been a kingmaker in NYC elections. In the 2025 race, the UFT’s Delegate Assembly endorsed Zohran Mamdani in July, citing his commitments to fully fund public schools, improve paraprofessional pay, and reform pension tiers. UFT President Michael Mulgrew praised Mamdani’s platform, stating in a press release that the endorsement reflects the union’s push for a mayor who prioritizes educators. This backing followed the UFT’s decision to sit out the Democratic primary due to internal divisions over issues like Israel-Gaza, but it has galvanized Mamdani’s campaign, enhancing his appeal among progressive voters and labor allies.
In contrast, Curtis Sliwa has garnered support from groups like Teachers for Choice, a coalition advocating for unvaccinated educators fired under prior mandates. They endorsed Sliwa for his pledge to reinstate and compensate such workers, highlighting his grassroots appeal in a post-pandemic landscape. Eric Adams, the incumbent, has touted his administration’s hiring of 3,700 teachers to reduce class sizes, but lacks fresh major union endorsements, potentially weakening his credibility amid declining poll numbers. Andrew Cuomo, running as an independent after losing the primary to Mamdani, has drawn criticism from education advocates for his past support of charter schools, with no notable endorsements from principals or unions in this cycle. The Council of School Supervisors and Administrators (CSA), representing principals, has issued endorsements in past races but remains neutral so far in 2025, though their political action committee continues to monitor candidates on administrative issues.
Policy Influence & Advocacy
Education leaders shape candidates’ platforms by advocating for policies on funding, curriculum, teacher pay, class sizes, and charter caps. Mamdani’s proposal to weaken mayoral control of schools—shifting power to teachers and parents—aligns with UFT priorities and has sparked debate over governance reform. He has considered chancellors like Meisha Ross Porter or Rita Joseph, emphasizing community input to address inequities. Sliwa counters with vows to cut bureaucratic waste, expand gifted programs, and protect the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT), appealing to parents frustrated with progressive reforms. Adams has focused on class size reductions, but critics argue his policies echo past mayors without bold innovation. Cuomo’s history of capping charters and pushing accountability measures influences his platform, though his independent bid limits union buy-in. Principals, through CSA, advocate for better administrative support, quietly pressuring candidates via policy forums.
Union Power & Negotiations
Teacher and administrator unions hold immense political weight, negotiating contracts that affect budgets and labor conditions. The UFT’s endorsement of Mamdani came amid negotiations for fair pay and smaller classes, underscoring their leverage—candidates must navigate union demands or face opposition that can mobilize thousands of voters. Mamdani’s support for union-backed reforms like fixing Tier 6 pensions positions him favorably, while Sliwa’s anti-mandate stance attracts dissident educators. Adams has clashed with unions over budget cuts, eroding his support, and Cuomo’s past tough negotiations with UFT during his governorship linger as a liability. CSA, meanwhile, influences through advocacy on principal autonomy, often requiring candidates to commit to reducing oversight.
Grassroots Mobilization
PTA networks and parent coalitions drive voter turnout by amplifying school issues in campaign narratives. Groups like PLACE NYC advocate for merit-based admissions, mobilizing against Mamdani’s past support for abolishing the SHSAT, which he has since moderated. Community Education Councils (CECs) engage in elections, with 2025 CEC races highlighting parent-led pushes for equity. For Adams, PTA support in outer boroughs bolsters his family-focused messaging, while Sliwa leverages parent frustrations over safety and vocational training. Cuomo’s campaign taps into moderate parent groups wary of radical changes, but Mamdani’s alliances with progressive coalitions like NYCKidsPAC enhance his grassroots edge.
Public vs. Quiet Influence
Publicly, leaders like UFT’s Mulgrew deliver speeches and op-eds, as seen in Mamdani’s endorsement rally where union members rallied for policy shifts. High-profile principals issue statements on platforms like X, critiquing candidates’ education visions. Behind the scenes, quiet lobbying occurs through private consultations and strategic introductions. For instance, union reps negotiate policy concessions in closed-door meetings, influencing platforms without fanfare. Principals advise candidates on administrative reforms via informal networks, as evidenced by CSA’s policy advocacy. This duality allows leaders to maintain neutrality publicly while steering outcomes privately, heightening stakes for Mamdani’s reformist agenda, Adams’ incumbency defense, Cuomo’s comeback bid, and Sliwa’s outsider challenge.
The 2025 race underscores how education leaders’ influence—whether through bold endorsements or subtle advocacy—could redefine NYC’s schools, affecting everything from budgets to equity. As polls show a tight contest, with Mamdani leading but vulnerable on education details, the political ramifications for all candidates remain profound.
Stay tuned for more updates on the election, and follow @highaski on X for real-time coverage.
Information published to or by The Industry Leader will never constitute legal, financial or business advice of any kind, nor should it ever be misconstrued or relied on as such. For individualized support for yourself or your business, we strongly encourage you to seek appropriate counsel.
